2nd, we discussed the kinds of relationships (or no) one to teenagers reported imagining and their chose media numbers

2nd, we discussed the kinds of relationships (or no) one to teenagers reported imagining and their chose media numbers

We create a beneficial eight-goods scale regarding the how dedicated teenagers was to contemplating and you may searching for their favorite star counted towards the an effective 4-point Likert measure (step one = less than weekly, 2 = once or twice weekly, step 3 = once a day, cuatro = from time to time day-after-day): (a) How many times you think regarding him/their particular? (b–e) exactly what do make use of to discover more on that it person’s real lifetime? Television, Websites, Journals, Friends; (f) How often are you willing to believe fulfilling this person? and you may (g) How often do you believe regarding variety of recommendations this individual will give you for many who went to their particular having good state? An enthusiastic exploratory principal axis factor analysis, direct varimax rotation (SPSS), served a single-foundation services, that have foundation loadings away from 0.54, 0.69, 0.89, 0.39, 0.78, 0.53, and 0.51, respectively; so it foundation accounted for % of one’s difference and you will demonstrated a beneficial reliability (Cronbach’s leader = 0.81).

Discussing

Four factors reviewed whether or not adolescents’ common their attention on the mass media data it entitled that have family and friends: “Do your loved ones/Really does all your family members remember that you love this person?” and you will “Might you along with your loved ones/household members discuss your/her to one another?” Answers was obtained step 1 = yes, 0 = zero for each and every of the five issues and you may averaged. A keen exploratory dominating axis grounds study, direct varimax rotation (SPSS), served a-one-basis services, having factor loadings of 0.43, 0.64, 0.51, and you may 0.61, respectively; it foundation accounted for % of variance and you will shown more compact accuracy (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.63).

Techniques

Agree forms was indeed distributed 2 weeks in advance of data collection; members finished assent versions. Studies grabbed as much as forty-five minute and you can was in fact completed on paper throughout the a beneficial 52-min group period. Boffins have been present to monitor and you will respond to questions.

Abilities

Results are claimed during the about three areas. Basic, we discussed the type of adolescents’ parasocial affairs, for instance the celebrities selected as well as the qualities teens recommended as the admirable during these mass media data. Lastly, i looked the message from adolescents’ parasocial procedure, in addition to connections anywhere between PSR and you can admired services, number of involvement for the parasocial procedure, emotional intensity of the experience, dedication to following news numbers, while the the total amount that teens shared these interests with individuals. The analyses was in fact presented into the framework out-of gender.

Celebs Chosen to own Parasocial Interest

Frequencies with which superstar items was in fact recommended are shown in Dining table ? Table1 1 . Our hypothesis you to teens would promote actors and you may vocalists at similar prices so you’re able to young adults was not served courtesy the brand new challenging interest off teenagers to-name actors. Media data various other kinds was in fact not often called, as hypothesized. Boys, yet not, entitled athletes within similar pricing into the mature take to out of Benefit and you will Lomore (2001), even if its studies elicited dancers and you can ours failed to. Contrary to our assumption one adolescents might be solely worried about way of life superstars, a couple teenagers (1.19%) called lifeless mass media data (Marilyn Monroe and you can Audrey Hepburn). In addition to, in lieu of this new adult decide to try, whose “other” category provided a professional photographer, entrepreneurs, a director, a great physicist, an evangelist, a malignant sД±cak Fas kadД±nlar tumors research fundraiser, and you will Princess Diana (Boon and you will Lomore, 2001), most of the superstar within our “general” classification try both a chat tell you host or a comedian which have you to definitely exemption (Linus Torvalds, founder of Linux kernel). Lastly, like in the mature take to, partners writers was named. For that reason, to your analyses one to go after, we chose to include the editors in the group with “general” celebrities. Our rationale is actually you to definitely though publishers commonly musicians such as chat reveal computers or comedians, they are doing offer enjoyment in place of using up other roles.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *